16.04.2014 09:08 Uhr in Wirtschaft & Finanzen und in Wirtschaft & Finanzen von GRP Rainer LLP Lawyers Tax Advisors
Regulations of commission for trade representative contracts
Regulations of commission for trade representative contractsKurzfassung: The contractual commission regulations of trade agents can be invalid if they are contradictory.
[GRP Rainer LLP Lawyers Tax Advisors - 16.04.2014] GRP Rainer Lawyers Tax Advisors, Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Düsseldorf, Hamburg, Munich, Stuttgart, Frankfurt www.grprainer.com elaborates: The higher regional court in Munich (Az. 23 U 4793/11) decided on March 22nd 2012 that commission determining clauses can be ineffective in view of coexisting and simultaneously completed cooperation agreement and trade-agent contract. According to § 307 para. 1 sentence 2 BGB (Federal code of law) they can be invalid if they are contradictory.
In this certain case at the higher regional court of Munich, two parties fought over the premise to claims of a commission for a trade-agent contract from a cooperation agreement, as well as, a simultaneously agreed upon and coexisting trade-agent contract. The defendant appealed that a claim to a commission payment can only be justified within the parameters of the cooperation agreement, if a finance-contract is prepared, completed and signed due to the trade-agents umpiring.
The higher regional court of Munich argued that in view of the trade-agent-contract, this clause stands in violation to the transparency dictate of § 307 para. 1 sentence 2 BGB. In the matter of dispute over the trade-agent-contract the regulation § 87 para. 1 HGB was used. According to the court the coexisting regulations of the cooperation agreement and the trade-agent-contract are unclear and contradictory. It also wasn't evident which regulation was prevalent. A predominant regulation could not be determined. In light of the cooperation agreements regulations, an unjustified disadvantage is assumed according to § 307 para. 2 BGB, because of the risk that the claim to a commission could be suppressed and invalidated by causality of the framework of the cooperation agreement.
The non-concessions complaint is pending at the German federal court under Az. VII ZR 114/12.
Let a lawyer advise you regarding trade-agent law affairs. A lawyer can counsel enterprisers, as well as trade agents regarding the structuring of contractual relationships: from claims to closure.
http://www.grprainer.com/en/Commercial-Agency-Law.html
In this certain case at the higher regional court of Munich, two parties fought over the premise to claims of a commission for a trade-agent contract from a cooperation agreement, as well as, a simultaneously agreed upon and coexisting trade-agent contract. The defendant appealed that a claim to a commission payment can only be justified within the parameters of the cooperation agreement, if a finance-contract is prepared, completed and signed due to the trade-agents umpiring.
The higher regional court of Munich argued that in view of the trade-agent-contract, this clause stands in violation to the transparency dictate of § 307 para. 1 sentence 2 BGB. In the matter of dispute over the trade-agent-contract the regulation § 87 para. 1 HGB was used. According to the court the coexisting regulations of the cooperation agreement and the trade-agent-contract are unclear and contradictory. It also wasn't evident which regulation was prevalent. A predominant regulation could not be determined. In light of the cooperation agreements regulations, an unjustified disadvantage is assumed according to § 307 para. 2 BGB, because of the risk that the claim to a commission could be suppressed and invalidated by causality of the framework of the cooperation agreement.
The non-concessions complaint is pending at the German federal court under Az. VII ZR 114/12.
Let a lawyer advise you regarding trade-agent law affairs. A lawyer can counsel enterprisers, as well as trade agents regarding the structuring of contractual relationships: from claims to closure.
http://www.grprainer.com/en/Commercial-Agency-Law.html
Weitere Informationen
GRP Rainer LLP Lawyers Tax Advisors, Herr Michael Rainer
Hohenzollernring 21-23, 50672 Cologne, Germany
Tel.: 0049 221-2722750; http://www.grprainer.com/en
Hohenzollernring 21-23, 50672 Cologne, Germany
Tel.: 0049 221-2722750; http://www.grprainer.com/en
Weitere Meldungen dieses Unternehmens
26.08.2014 Ship funds: World trade losing momentum
Pressefach abonnieren
via RSS-Feed abonnieren
via E-Mail abonnieren
Pressekontakt
Herr Michael Rainer
GRP Rainer LLP Lawyers Tax Advisors
Hohenzollernring 21-23
50672 Cologne
Germany
Drucken
Weiterempfehlen
PDF
Schlagworte
Permanentlinks
https://www.prmaximus.de/102969GRP Rainer LLP Lawyers Tax Advisors
Hohenzollernring 21-23
50672 Cologne
Germany
https://www.prmaximus.de/pressefach/grp-rainer-llp-lawyers-tax-advisors-pressefach.html
Die Pressemeldung "Regulations of commission for trade representative contracts" unterliegt dem Urheberrecht.
Jegliche Verwendung dieses Textes, auch auszugsweise, erfordert die vorherige schriftliche Erlaubnis des Autors.
Autor der Pressemeldung "Regulations of commission for trade representative contracts" ist GRP Rainer LLP Lawyers Tax Advisors, vertreten durch Michael Rainer.