23.10.2013 09:47 Uhr in Wirtschaft & Finanzen und in Wirtschaft & Finanzen von GRP Rainer Rechtsanwälte Steuerberater
Impermissibility of unfounded time-limitation even when longer than three years since restriction - Employment law
Impermissibility of unfounded time-limitation even when longer than three years since restriction - Employment lawKurzfassung: The unfounded restriction of an employment relationship is impermissible even when it is longer than three years since the time-limitation.
[GRP Rainer Rechtsanwälte Steuerberater - 23.10.2013] GRP Rainer Lawyers and Tax Advisors in Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Bremen, Dusseldorf, Essen, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Hanover, Munich, Nuremberg, Stuttgart and London www.grprainer.com/en conclude: The Regional Labour Court (LAG) of Baden-Württemberg had to rule on a case in which the claimant opposed the time-limitation vis-à -vis his last employment contract. The claimant was employed at a company in the metalworking and electronics industry. He had restricted employment contracts from August 27, 2007 until November 30, 2007 and again from February 1, 2011 until June 30, 2011, which was extended until May 31, 2012 and once again until January 1, 2013. The LAG ruled in its judgment of September 26, 2013 (Az.: 6 Sa 28/13), that the unfounded restriction on an employment relationship should be impermissible even when it has been longer than three years since the time-limitation.
In doing so, the LAG deviated from the prior jurisprudence of the Federal Labour Court (BAG).The LAG took the view that the BAG had exceeded in particular the boundaries of judicial legal development with its previous case law. The LAG allowed the appeal.
An employment contract is a mutual agreement between the employer and the employee. The employment contract represents the foundation of every employment relationship and can vary in its design taking into account statutory or internal company specifications. If the employment contract contains clauses which do not conform to the statutory minimum, this can result in the nullity of the contract.
Within the framework an employment contract, both primary and secondary obligations of the employee can be regulated. Although both parties generally have the possibility to negotiate with respect to the terms of the contract, these are frequently predetermined by the employer. This also applies to a time-limitation on the employment contract.
Legal disputes can therefore arise quickly with an employment contract. The enforcement of any claims can be especially difficult. With an employment contract it comes down to the details. A lawyer versed in the field of labour law can draw-up watertight employment contracts. With a sense for economic solutions and legal detail, he can even examine existing employment contracts.
http://www.grprainer.com/en/Employment-Law.html
In doing so, the LAG deviated from the prior jurisprudence of the Federal Labour Court (BAG).The LAG took the view that the BAG had exceeded in particular the boundaries of judicial legal development with its previous case law. The LAG allowed the appeal.
An employment contract is a mutual agreement between the employer and the employee. The employment contract represents the foundation of every employment relationship and can vary in its design taking into account statutory or internal company specifications. If the employment contract contains clauses which do not conform to the statutory minimum, this can result in the nullity of the contract.
Within the framework an employment contract, both primary and secondary obligations of the employee can be regulated. Although both parties generally have the possibility to negotiate with respect to the terms of the contract, these are frequently predetermined by the employer. This also applies to a time-limitation on the employment contract.
Legal disputes can therefore arise quickly with an employment contract. The enforcement of any claims can be especially difficult. With an employment contract it comes down to the details. A lawyer versed in the field of labour law can draw-up watertight employment contracts. With a sense for economic solutions and legal detail, he can even examine existing employment contracts.
http://www.grprainer.com/en/Employment-Law.html
Weitere Informationen
GRP Rainer Rechtsanwälte Steuerberater, Herr M Rainer
Hohenzollernring 21-23, 50672 Köln, Deutschland
Tel.: 0221-2722750; http://www.grprainer.com
Hohenzollernring 21-23, 50672 Köln, Deutschland
Tel.: 0221-2722750; http://www.grprainer.com
Weitere Meldungen dieses Unternehmens
03.09.2014 Filmfonds: Happy End im Steuerstreit?
Pressefach abonnieren
via RSS-Feed abonnieren
via E-Mail abonnieren
Pressekontakt
Herr M Rainer
GRP Rainer Rechtsanwälte Steuerberater
Hohenzollernring 21-23
50672 Köln
Deutschland
Drucken
Weiterempfehlen
PDF
Schlagworte
Permanentlinks
https://www.prmaximus.de/93423GRP Rainer Rechtsanwälte Steuerberater
Hohenzollernring 21-23
50672 Köln
Deutschland
https://www.prmaximus.de/pressefach/grp-rainer-rechtsanwälte-steuerberater-pressefach.html
Die Pressemeldung "Impermissibility of unfounded time-limitation even when longer than three years since restriction - Employment law" unterliegt dem Urheberrecht.
Jegliche Verwendung dieses Textes, auch auszugsweise, erfordert die vorherige schriftliche Erlaubnis des Autors.
Autor der Pressemeldung "Impermissibility of unfounded time-limitation even when longer than three years since restriction - Employment law" ist GRP Rainer Rechtsanwälte Steuerberater, vertreten durch M Rainer.