09.12.2013 10:46 Uhr in Wirtschaft & Finanzen und in Wirtschaft & Finanzen von GRP Rainer LLP Lawyers Tax Advisors
Advertising with external brand names - Trademark Law
Advertising with external brand names - Trademark LawKurzfassung: If an external brand name is used as a component for one's own advertising, the trade-mark proprietor can potentially file for injunctive relief.
[GRP Rainer LLP Lawyers Tax Advisors - 09.12.2013] GRP Rainer Attorneys and Tax Advisors in Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Düsseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Munich, Stuttgart and London www.grprainer.com/en explain: With its judgment from March 21, 2014 (file ref. no.: 6 U 170/12), the Higher Regional Court (OLG) Frankfurt decided that an injunctive relief should be granted to the trade-mark against a shopkeeper if the shopkeeper uses external brand names as a component of its own advertising. The Court had to decide this case in which the defendant was advertising with signs on which the brand name of the plaintiff was being used to campaign as part of the defendant's advertising. The Court took the position that the trade-mark owner could be at risk that potential customers might assume that a contractual relationship may exist between the trader and the trade-mark proprietor.
The plaintiff had sold their products only to exclusive partners and saw the use of their trade-mark in such advertising as a violation of their brand name. The plaintiff wanted to avoid damage to their reputation which had been acquired through exclusive distribution. Now, with its decision, the Court had confirmed this view. According to the judge, damage to image should constitute valid grounds of the claim. Against the acceptance of a contractual relationship between the plaintiff companies and the defendant by potential customers should also not particularly have indicated that even more brand names would have appeared on the advertising signs in addition to the trade- mark of the applicant.
An indication in the window of the dealer of a non-existent relationship between the parties should, only under certain circumstances, be construed as a risk of misleading the customer. This is the case only, in particular, if the consumer would also perceive such an indication in the context knowing the brand. In the present case, the defendant could not have made such reference due to inadequate indication of the brand.
The subject matter of trade-mark law may sometimes cause problems and is often difficult to understand for non-experts. In terms of possibilities and consequences, it is of particularly great importance to make an accurate legal assessment.
An attorney experienced in commercial law provides extensive consultation for individual cases in the area of commercial law.
http://www.grprainer.com/en/Trademark-Protection.html
The plaintiff had sold their products only to exclusive partners and saw the use of their trade-mark in such advertising as a violation of their brand name. The plaintiff wanted to avoid damage to their reputation which had been acquired through exclusive distribution. Now, with its decision, the Court had confirmed this view. According to the judge, damage to image should constitute valid grounds of the claim. Against the acceptance of a contractual relationship between the plaintiff companies and the defendant by potential customers should also not particularly have indicated that even more brand names would have appeared on the advertising signs in addition to the trade- mark of the applicant.
An indication in the window of the dealer of a non-existent relationship between the parties should, only under certain circumstances, be construed as a risk of misleading the customer. This is the case only, in particular, if the consumer would also perceive such an indication in the context knowing the brand. In the present case, the defendant could not have made such reference due to inadequate indication of the brand.
The subject matter of trade-mark law may sometimes cause problems and is often difficult to understand for non-experts. In terms of possibilities and consequences, it is of particularly great importance to make an accurate legal assessment.
An attorney experienced in commercial law provides extensive consultation for individual cases in the area of commercial law.
http://www.grprainer.com/en/Trademark-Protection.html
Weitere Informationen
GRP Rainer LLP Lawyers Tax Advisors, Herr Michael Rainer
Hohenzollernring 21-23, 50672 Cologne, Germany
Tel.: 0049 221-2722750; http://www.grprainer.com/en
Hohenzollernring 21-23, 50672 Cologne, Germany
Tel.: 0049 221-2722750; http://www.grprainer.com/en
Weitere Meldungen dieses Unternehmens
26.08.2014 Ship funds: World trade losing momentum
Pressefach abonnieren
via RSS-Feed abonnieren
via E-Mail abonnieren
Pressekontakt
Herr Michael Rainer
GRP Rainer LLP Lawyers Tax Advisors
Hohenzollernring 21-23
50672 Cologne
Germany
Drucken
Weiterempfehlen
PDF
Schlagworte
Permanentlinks
https://www.prmaximus.de/96213GRP Rainer LLP Lawyers Tax Advisors
Hohenzollernring 21-23
50672 Cologne
Germany
https://www.prmaximus.de/pressefach/grp-rainer-llp-lawyers-tax-advisors-pressefach.html
Die Pressemeldung "Advertising with external brand names - Trademark Law" unterliegt dem Urheberrecht.
Jegliche Verwendung dieses Textes, auch auszugsweise, erfordert die vorherige schriftliche Erlaubnis des Autors.
Autor der Pressemeldung "Advertising with external brand names - Trademark Law" ist GRP Rainer LLP Lawyers Tax Advisors, vertreten durch Michael Rainer.